Skip to Main Content

Impressionism is one of the most recognizable art movements in the world today, but it was revolutionary in its time. Originating in France in 1874, it was rejected by critics at first—only later embraced as a national symbol.

In the mid-19th century, France saw rapid technological and social changes. Gathering in cafés to discuss these societal transformations, the impressionists found opportunities for liberation. They changed the way they painted, in both subject matter and technique. They also met to discuss how, when, and where to exhibit their art. Learn more about the movement and discover the telltale markers of an impressionist work of art.

1. The term “impressionist” came from a derisive review of a Claude Monet painting.

In 1874, Monet’s Impression, Sunrise appeared in the first exhibition held by an association of artists. They called themselves La Société anonyme des artistes peintres, sculpteurs et graveurs, etc. (the Anonymous Association of Painters, Sculptors, and Engravers, etc). 

Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1872, oil on canvas, Musée Marmottan Monet, gift of Eugène and Victorine Donop de Monchy, 1940. Inv. 4014. Photo: © Musée Marmottan Monet, Paris / Studio Christian Baraja SLB

Journalist and art critic Louis Leroy published a scathing review titled The Exhibition of the Impressionists. In Leroy’s article, two imagined skeptical viewers scratch their heads at the works on view. One of them comments on Monet’s painting: “Wallpaper in its embryonic state is more finished than that seascape.”

Leroy used the term “impressionist” disparagingly. But it became a rallying cry for artists like Berthe Morisot, Auguste Renoir, Alfred Sisley, Camille Pissarro, and others.

2. Impressionists used thick, loose brushstrokes of contrasting color.

When the impressionists first began exhibiting, the Académie des Beaux-Arts was still the arbiter of taste. It exercised its influence through Paris’s annual exhibition, the Salon. The academicians favored precise drawing, carefully rendered composition, and smoothly finished surfaces.

But impressionist painters broke with that tradition. They did not conceal their brushstrokes. They used choppy marks and dabs of unblended colors. They did not hide the fact that their works were made of paint. They were not seeking an illusion of reality.

Compare Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres’ portrait of Madame Moitessier, with Mary Cassatt’s The Loge.

Shown from the knees up, a pale-skinned woman wearing an off-the-shoulder, black gown stands in front of a maroon-red wall in this vertical portrait painting. Her body is angled to our left, but she turns her round face to us. Her dark gray eyes seem out of focus, looking slightly off to either side of us, under faint brows. Her nose is straight, her pink lips closed over a pillowy chin, and her cheeks are lightly blushed. Her black hair is parted down the middle and smoothed to each side, pulled back and framed by a garland of flowers that drapes from the crown of her head down to either side of her chin like parentheses. The garland is made of peach-colored roses, burgundy-red flowers, and sage-green leaves. Her sloping shoulders are pale and smooth. The sleeves of the black dress wrapping around her upper arms are edged with a wide band of lace. The edge of a white undergarment is visible along the top of the black dress, which has a tightly fitting bodice. The skirt billows out at the narrow waist to fall in thick, heavy folds off the bottom edge of the painting. A large, oval, red jewel is set into a silvery-gold brooch at the front center of her neckline. Dimples are visible across the backs of both pudgy hands. With her right hand, on our left, she holds the end of a long strand of pearls encircling her neck. On that wrist is a gold bracelet with coin-like disks hanging from thick, gold links, and she wears a gold ring with a pearl and blue and red jewels on that ring finger. Her other arm hangs by her side. There, she wears two bracelets, one of gold and pearl, the other with a medallion of celestial blue enamel surrounding a pearl, also set in gold. Two gold rings with red stones are on the third finger of that hand, and a silver ring with a crest is on her pinky finger. With that hand she holds a closed fan with silver and gold sticks, and the end of a sheer black shawl that wraps up across her back and over the other shoulder. The top two-thirds of the wall behind her is covered by a pattern of stylized wine-red flowers against a muted maroon-red background. A wooden rail divides the top section of the wall from the gray paneling below. A few objects in the lower left corner, seen beyond the edge of her skirt, are difficult to make out, but could include a richly decorated gold and upholstered chair, a glove, and a white, lace-edged handkerchief. The artist signed and dated the painting in the lower left corner of the red patterned wall: “I.A.D. INGRES P.XIT ANO 1851.” The woman’s name appears in the upper right, “M.E INES MOITESSIER NÉE DE FOUCAULD.”

Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Madame Moitessier, 1851, oil on canvas, Samuel H. Kress Collection, 1946.7.18

Shown from the knees up, two young women with pale, peachy skin wearing white gowns sit close together and almost fill this vertical painting. The women are angled to our left and look in that direction. The young woman on our right has a heart-shaped face, dark blond hair gathered at the back of her head, and light blue eyes. Her full, coral-pink lips are closed, the corners in greenish shadows. Her dress is off the shoulders, has a tightly fitted bodice, and the skirt pools around her lap. The fabric is painted in strokes of pale shell pink, faint blue, and light mint green but our eye reads it as a white dress. She wears a navy-blue ribbon as a choker and long, frosty-green gloves come nearly to her elbows. She holds a bouquet in her lap, made up of cream-white, butter-yellow, and pale pink flowers with grass-green leaves and one blood-red rose. Her companion sits just beyond her on our left and covers the lower part of her face with an open fan. The fan is painted in silvery white decorated with swipes of daffodil yellow, teal green, and coral red. She has violet-colored eyes, a short nose, and her dark blond hair is smoothed over the top of her head and pulled back. She also wears long gloves with her arms crossed on the lap of her ice-blue gown. Along the right edge of hte painting, a sliver of a form mirroring the torso, shoulder, and back of the head of the young woman to our right appears just beyond her shoulder, painted in tones of cool blues. Two curving bands in golden yellow and spring green swiped with darker shades of green and gold arc behind the girls and fill the background. The space between the curves is filled with strokes of plum purple, dark red, and pink. The artist signed the lower right, “Mary Cassatt.”

Mary Cassatt, The Loge, c. 1878-1880, oil on canvas, Chester Dale Collection, 1963.10.96

Ingres was the quintessential academic master. He rendered Madame Moitessier’s black lace and shiny baubles in exquisite detail. Cassatt merely suggests the satin of her opera-goers' dresses through luminous color, and not delicate threadwork and draping.

Close-up of Madame Moitessier's face from her 1851 portrait by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres

Detail of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres' Madame Moitessier1851, oil on canvas, Samuel H. Kress Collection, 1946.7.18

Close up detail of the bodice of the figure on the right in Mary Cassatt's The Loge

Detail of Mary Cassatt, The Loge, c. 1878-1880, oil on canvas, Chester Dale Collection, 1963.10.96

Madame Moitessier's complexion and hair are smooth and shiny in Ingre's portrait. Meanwhile, the faces of Cassatt’s subjects are crisscrossed with blue, yellow, purple, and red hatch marks. One of them even conceals her face with a fan, an anonymity no wealthy patron would tolerate.

Detail of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres' Madame Moitessier1851, oil on canvas, Samuel H. Kress Collection, 1946.7.18

Detail of Mary Cassatt, The Loge, c. 1878-1880, oil on canvas, Chester Dale Collection, 1963.10.96

3. Impressionists worked outside in nature, paying close attention to light and color.

The impressionists took their canvases and easels outdoors, an en plein air working style made possible by recent innovations. Paint tubes had made oil paint portable, and the rail system allowed quick excursions from Paris to the countryside.

Of course, artists had already been making careful observations of nature outdoors. But they had been recording them in sketches and studies to be referenced later in their studios. This had allowed them to combine different components and compose idealized scenes.

By working on full paintings outdoors, impressionists quickly captured the initial sensations that landscapes elicited. There was no time to carefully model objects and structures. The artists also had to adapt to changing light and weather conditions.

Monet advised young painters: 

“When you go out to paint, try to forget the objects before you, a tree, a house, a field, or whatever. Merely think, here is a little square of blue, here an oblong of pink, here is a streak of yellow, and paint it just as it looks to you, the exact color and shape, until it gives your own naive impression of the scene before you."

4. Impressionists placed modern life at the center of their art.

The Académie had followed a strict hierarchy of subject matter. At the highest level, art was to depict a moral narrative: from history, the Bible, or mythological stories.

But the impressionists turned away from these themes. Instead, they sought to capture their current moment, a time of enormous upheaval. Paris was just emerging from the Franco-Prussian War and a brief but brutal civil war. The city was reborn into a modern metropolis. It played backdrop to middle-class leisure activities like boating and horse races, the ballet and the opera. Its new railways became gateways to the enjoyment of nature in the countryside.

The impressionists’ sitters are painted not in glamorous poses, but in the moments in between. They’re at rest or lost in thought. They are shown in newly available ready-to-wear clothing instead of luxurious fashions. They are not wealthy patrons, but friends, relatives, or laborers. To viewers accustomed to grand paintings of important people and dramatic events, these works felt thoroughly modern.

More than a century later, the paintings still strike us as breezy and refreshing. Impressionism forever changed the trajectory of Western art—and the way we look at pictures.

Explore more stories

August 12, 2024